The
Lost Tribes of Israel
Bruce
R. McConkie
When
Shalmanezer overran the Kingdom of Israel (about 721 B.C.), he
carried the Ten Tribes comprising that kingdom captive into Assyria.
From thence they were led into the lands of the north and have been
called the Lost Tribes because they are lost to the knowledge of
other people. (1 Ne. 22:4.) "We have no knowledge of the
location condition of that part if the Ten Tribes who went into the
north country." (Compendium, p. 88.)
Esdras,
an apocryphal writer, records this version of their escape from
Assyria: "Those are the ten tribes, which were carried away
prisoners out of their own land in the time of Osea the king, whom
Salmanasar the king of Assyria led away captive, and he carried them
over the waters, and so came they into another land. But they took
this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of
the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind
dwelt, That they might there keep their statutes, which they never
kept in their own land. And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow
passage of the river. For the most High then shewed signs for them,
and held still the flood, till they were passed over. For through
that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a
half: and the same region is called Arsareth. Then dwelt they there
until the latter times; and now when they shall begin to come, The
Highest shall stay the stream again, that they may go through."
(Apocrypha, 2 Esdras 13:40-47)
Commenting
on this, Elder George Reynolds has written: "They determined to
go to a country where never men dwelt, that they might be free from
all contaminating influences. That country could only be found in the
north. Southern Asia was already the seat of a comparatively ancient
civilization. Egypt flourished in northern Africa, and southern
Europe was rapidly filling with the future rulers of the world. They
had, therefore, no choice but to turn their faces northward. The
first portion of their journey was not however north; according to
the account of Esdras, they appear to have at first moved in the
direction of their old homes, and it is possible that they originally
started with the intention of returning thereto, or probably in order
to receive the Assyrians they started as if to return to Canaan, and
when they had crossed the Euphrates, and were out of danger from the
hosts of the Medes and Persians then they turned their journeying
feet toward the polar star. Esdras states that they entered in at the
narrow passages of the River Euphrates, the Lord staying the springs
of the flood until they were passed over. The point on the River
Euphrates at which they crossed would necessarily be in its upper
portion, as lower down would be too far south for their purpose.
"The
upper course of the Euphrates lies among lofty mountains and near the
village of Pastash, it plunges through a gorge formed by precipices
more than a thousand feet in height and so narrow that it is bridged
at the top; it shortly afterward enters the plains of Mesopotamia.
How accurately this portion of the river answers the description of
Esdras of the narrows, where the Israelites crossed.
"From
the Euphrates the wandering host could take but one course in their
journey northward, and that was along the back or eastern shore of
the Black Sea. All other roads were impassable to them, as the
Caucasian range of mountains with only two or three passes throughout
its whole extent, ran as a lofty barrier from the Black to the
Caspian Sea. To go east would take them back to Media, and a westward
journey would carry them through Asia Minor to the coasts of the
Mediterranean. Skirting along the Black Sea, they would pass the
Caucasian range, cross the Kuban River, be prevented by the Sea of
Azof from turning westward and would soon reach the present home of
the Don Cossaks." (Reynolds, Are We of Israel, pp. 27-28.)
"Is
it altogether improbable that in that long journey of one and a half
years, as Esdras states it, from Media the land of their captivity to
the frozen north, some of the backsliding Israel rebelled, turned
aside from the main body, forgot their God, by and by mingled with
the Gentiles and became the leaven to leaven with the promised seed
all the nations of the earth? The account given in the Book of Mormon
of a single family of this same house, its waywardness its
stiffneckedness before God, its internal quarrels and family feuds
are, we fear, an example on a small scale of what most probably
happened in the vast bodies of Israelites who for so many months
wended their tedious way northward. Laman and Lemuel had, no doubt,
many counterparts in the journeying Ten Tribes. And who so likely to
rebel as stubborn, impetuous, proud and warlike Ephraim? Rebellion
and backsliding have been so characteristically the story of
Ephraim's career that he can scarcely conceive that it could be
otherwise and yet preserve the unities of that people's history. Can
it be any wonder then that so much of the blood of Ephraim has been
found hidden and unknown in the midst of the nations of northern
Europe and other parts until the spirit of prophecy revealed its
existence?" (Are We of Israel, pp. 10-11.)
The
Lost Tribes are not lost unto the Lord. In their northward
journeyings they were led by prophets and inspired leaders. They had
their Moses and their Lehi, were guided by the spirit of revelation,
kept the law of Moses, and carried with them the statutes and
judgments which the Lord had given them in age past. They were still
a distinct people many hundreds of years later, for the resurrected
Lord visited and ministered among them following his ministry on this
continent among the Nephites. (3 Ne. 16:1-4; 17:4.) Obviously he
taught them in the same way and gave them the same truths which he
gave his followers in Jerusalem and on the American continent; and
obviously they recorded his teachings, thus creating volumes of
scripture comparable to the Bible and Book of Mormon. (2 Ne.
29:12-14.)
In
due course the Lost Tribes of Israel will return and come to the
children of Ephraim to receive their blessings. This great gathering
will take place under the direction of the President of The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for he holds the keys of "the
gathering of Israel from the four parts of the earth, and the leading
of the ten tribes from the land of the north." (D. & C.
110:11.) Keys are the right of presidency the power to direct; and by
this power the Lost Tribes will return, with "their prophets"
and their scriptures to "be crowned with glory, even in Zion, by
the hands of the servants of the Lord, even the children of Ephraim."
(D. & C. 133:26-35.)
At
the October, 1916, general conference of the Church, Elder James E.
Talmage made this prediction: "The tribes shall come, they are
not lost unto the Lord; they shall be brought forth as hath been
predicted; and I say unto you there are those now living — aye
some here present — who shall live to read the records of the
Lost Tribes of Israel, which shall be made one with the record of the
Jews, or the Holy Bible, and the record of the Nephites, or the Book
of Mormon, even as the Lord hath predicted; and those records, which
the tribes lost to man but yet to be found again shall bring, shall
tell of the visit of the resurrected Christ to them, after he had
manifested himself to the Nephites upon this continent."
(Articles of Faith, p. 513.)
Bruce
R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine